hackthis_archive ([personal profile] hackthis_archive) wrote2005-10-27 11:50 am

Today's topic of discussion.

In today's Variety there's an article on Brokeback Mountain, one of many that have come out over the last few months and which will doubtlessly be followed by many more. I mention this because in reading it this comment caught my eye,


I don't believe they would have ever allowed an openly queer director to make this movie, nor do I believe that actors of this calibre would have signed on. In a long line of ironic outcomes, it took these guys [Jake Gyllenhaal & Heath Ledger] with impeccable heterosexual credentials to make this kind of breakthrough.
-Critic and author B. Ruby Rich

Do you lot agree with that?

Discuss.

[identity profile] avid-slacker.livejournal.com 2005-10-27 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
The only reason this movie could be made at all is that it's a bloody tragedy in which things end badly for our gay romantic leads.

Now if our heroes rode off happily into the sunset together, that would be a mainstream movie breakthrough.


I could not agree more. I agree that because the director is straight he gets more cred, but I think the subject matter is much more important. A film about a happy gay couple that isn't rife with stereotypes (I'm thinking Birdcage) would never be successful bacause gay isn't acceptable unless it's being used to promote some great social enlightnement.