hackthis_archive (
hackthis_archive) wrote2004-10-09 04:22 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Book Six spoilers plus a tea plea.
JKR has made an announcement regarding Book Six
Is nothing sacred, woman? She better kill somebody that nobody remembers. ::hides Theodore behind her back:: I'm just saying. ::hides Neville in linen closet:: I'm the one who whacks people in this universe, not her! ::hides Dean and Seamus:: She's infringing on my territory! ::hides entire Weasley clan, with the exception of Percy in same room as Crabbe and Goyle::
Oh, d'you think it's Percy? I hope it's not Oliver. Could be Victor. Or Fleur!
Remus has suffered enough, oooooh maybe it's Peter.
My problem with knowing this now, apart from the fact that I didn't want to know any spoilers and the media apparently don't give a fuck, is that now I'm going to be stressed out the entire time I read Book Six, wondering who she'll have whacked.
This sucks, dude.
Would some benevolent soul in the UK be able to pop over to Tescos/Sainsbury's/Waitrose and get me some fruit tea? I have people who normally do this, but one's on holiday and the other, well, he's got memory issues. Nothing with lemon or ginger please. I will reimburse or um, write you something.
no subject
You're allowed to kill people cause...y'know, you do it better than she does! :-p
I say sue *evil grin* or set a couple Dementors loose on her or somethin'.
no subject
I feel your dismay.
no subject
Oh wait, we already do that.
Guess we'll bitch and moan and rail and pout. :-p Or something *G*
no subject
no subject
DON'T SPEAK LIKE THAT, IT HURTS MY HEART.
no subject
I hadn't given that much thought, but yes, it could be Mad-Eye or Fudge or Trelawney. As always the latest DADA professor is a good bet.
no subject
Well, ok, it bothers me slightly overall that anyone else is going to die. If you QUITE remember, Joanne, that happened in the last two books.
If you want shock-value, write some bloody porn into it. Stop killing off our beloved.
no subject
no subject
hang myself in the bathroom with the showercurtainspontaneously die of shock.After I've wept.
*is not over Sirius*
J
no subject
no subject
I'm fairly easy, Twinings or London Tea Co. works. Various berry assortments, mint, etc. As I said just no lemon or ginger.
Thanks :)
no subject
http://www.ukgoods.com/
;)
no subject
::looks grim::
Or Draco. Harry's gonna whack Draco at some point. Actually, that begs the question -- do you think she'll have Harry KILL a baddie before Book 7 in warm up for Voldemort? How deep will his post-Sirius personal darkness go?
As long as it's not Dumbledore. I'm petrified of a Kenobi and/or Gandalf thing going on.
no subject
no subject
I suspect you're right.
::looks stern::
I'm always right.
I have a title for the Nott fic I'll end up writing when I get my brain back from Theodore ...
Here on the border of right and wrong: Things every Slytherin should know
no subject
I think it's likely to be Dumbledore. The hero has to lose his/her mentor in the Journey myth; that's why it happened to Obi-Wan and Gandalf.
I don't know that JKR (or Harry) cares enough for Draco to off him. He's a pest, not an Evil Adversary. Besides, WAAAHHSHECAN'TKILLMYDRACONONONO!!!
no subject
How is this different from before?
When we're being rational, we all *know* she's gone to whack at least one named character who people have grown attached to in Book Six. She's escalating, it's a *war*.
Book four: whack Cedric, who had only been in that book.
Book five: whack Sirius, a secondary character we're emotionally attached to, and do it so that some of us can think maybe he's not dead.
. . .
Book seven: it's absolutely certain that she will whack at least one *major* character in the process of defeating Voldemort. Every secondary character can be assumed to be at high risk.
To keep the tension building from 5 to 7, Book 6 *has* to have either the death of one of the older major characters (e.g. Hagrid) or several deaths among secondary characters (e.g. Seamus, Tonks, Goyle).
There was *never* any hope that she wouldn't whack someone in Book 6, so this "spoiler" actually conveys no new information.
no subject
I'm going to have to disagree. I don't necessarily think it was an issue of not having hope as much as not having it as something in the forefront of my conscious. As you pointed out, yes, this is a war and obviously people are going to die because that's what happens during war. At the same time though, at least for me, it's not the first thing I think of when I'm wondering what will occur in Book Six. I'm far more preoccupied with Harry-development and Neville-development and whether or not Tonks is as big a MS as she seems to be, and therefore, this does spoil my enjoyment of the story to a certain degree, hence referring to this news as a 'spoiler'.
no subject
Blast!
Re: Blast!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Jesus, I've never been so stressed reading a book as I was with OotP, waiting to find out - I almost wished I had been spoiled to know who it was, bc then I wouldn't have had that unknowing dread. The night between my two days of reading it was filled with dreams of Hermione or Ron being killed off (though those images disturbed me less than I later felt they should have)... dammit, I don't want to go through that stress again.
no subject
And...I wonder. Why are there so many speculations on Ron's possible demise and almost none on Hermione's? I've yet to come across a prediction that Hermione will buy it in any book (I personally don't think any of the Trio's going to die).
no subject
Or would she? *cue suspenseful music*
no subject
IF IT IS NEVILLE I KILL THE WORLD. Or Ron. Or Hermione. Maybe it's Grawp!
no subject
Irrationally, I'd be highly pissed if Fudge died.
no subject
Hagrid sort of presents himself as the one last link to Harry's childhood and previous innocence, being the first wizard Harry knew when he was still innocent, young and jailbait-y (cancel the last one). Harry's growing up now and I think JRK would kill Hagrid to cut away all of Harry's links to his previous innocence. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? *INCOHERENT*
On the other hand, my money's on Grawp squashing Hagrid.
no subject
Hagrid was Harry's first guide (and I agree that he's redundant right now). BUT. *jumps on soapbox* Harry's main guide to the WW is not Hagrid but Ron He's the archetypal guide, the one who introduces Harry to his new world and helps him manoeuvre around the obstacles that would trip Harry up, travelling with him on the path that Harry will ultimately have to follow alone. I don't think Ron will die in the story, because I think that Harry might completely fall apart if that happened. But I think a lot of people don't see Ron as the strong guide he is, and I really blame the films for that, as much as I may like them. Ron is NOT Harry's sidekick, no matter how many of his lines WB gives to Hermione.
Er. Sorry for the rant. *blush*
no subject
no subject
Truthfully I've believed for some time now that Hagrid will be killed off. Will he be the casualty of book 6? I do not know. But I know that she told Robbie Coltrane all of Hagrid's storylines for the future novels.... I just have a feeling. At least we don't have to wait years upon years to find out, unless the publishing date gets pushed back again.
no subject