Is being pretty really all that?
Jan. 26th, 2004 04:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I’m over here shifting through Jude Law photographs for Draco icons, and I remembered a conversation that I had with somebody last week (possibly in RL, possibly with
serialkarma or
ethrosdemon) and now I must inquire what other people think. The gist of the conversation had to do with Boys vs. Men vs. The Others, i.e. Beautiful Men and who really comes out on top.
Now, we all know what Boys are. We date ‘boys.’ We think boys are cute. We refer to them as The Boy. Ryan Gosling is a boy. Dom Monaghan is a boy. We all love boys. They are adorable. They wear Chuck Taylors and cute second-hand shirts. They belch, and we just roll our eyes. They have beer nights with *their* boys and we just smirk, because they are boys, and we expect this, because boys are not *men*. Men are another species altogether.
Men sometimes have facial hair. They generally own more than one suit, and it’s a good suit, too! A fair amount own property. They can cook more than one meal without burning it. Men have deeper voices, and they exude testosterone. “Men” tend to make your ovaries act funny. George Clooney is a man. Johnny Depp is a man. Brad Pitt in all his 40-year-old glory is a man. Men are good. Boys are good. People take them seriously to the best of their ability, but what happens when you come to those with the XY chromosomes who don’t quite fit the mould? I speak, naturally, of Beautiful Men.
I generally stick Beautiful Men in the “Other” category, because they are not quite men, but they’re not quite boys either. They are a category unto themselves. Whereas Men make your ovaries hurt, Beautiful Men give you cramps. You walk into walls. You forget how to speak. Beautiful Men tend to make women, and other men, act kind of stupid. You forgive the belching and scratching and other pet peeves. BM’s make us all a little messy, and they tend to bring down the average IQ in every room they enter. Jude Law is a beautiful man. Tom Welling may not be Einstein, but when he smiles, people do not fucking care. He is a beautiful man. And yet, in a society where everybody wants to be flawless and thin and *perfect* (whatever the hell that is), is it really better to be an “Other?”
I suspect it must be a bit harder to be taken seriously if you’re a Beautiful Man, because who really cares what you have to say? You look good; people don’t want to hear your thoughts on global warming! So, is it better to be beautiful, but not preternaturally so? Can life really be hard when you look like Jude Law? In an recent Details interview, he talked about 2003 being the worst year of his life. He split with his wife, their divorce was all over the rags, and then he had to explain it all to his children. This cannot have been easy by any account, but it makes you wonder -- people have to go through this same thing everyday, so it’s not like he’s the first person to have a messy divorce. And yet, do you think people have more sympathy for him because he’s good looking or less? Why? Do we always feel this way about people we consider to be more attractive than normal? Why? Is it jealousy? Conditioning? I understand the scientific explanations about feature placement and the way that humans tend to desire symmetry, etc, but I really do have to ask, do people think that life is better for the pretty people just because they can get in a club easier or a few free drinks?
Do you guys think being attractive all it’s cracked up to be? And who would you rather have? A Man, a Boy or an Other?
*Who knew Jude Law could make anybody think so hard!
[Poll #239134]
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Now, we all know what Boys are. We date ‘boys.’ We think boys are cute. We refer to them as The Boy. Ryan Gosling is a boy. Dom Monaghan is a boy. We all love boys. They are adorable. They wear Chuck Taylors and cute second-hand shirts. They belch, and we just roll our eyes. They have beer nights with *their* boys and we just smirk, because they are boys, and we expect this, because boys are not *men*. Men are another species altogether.
Men sometimes have facial hair. They generally own more than one suit, and it’s a good suit, too! A fair amount own property. They can cook more than one meal without burning it. Men have deeper voices, and they exude testosterone. “Men” tend to make your ovaries act funny. George Clooney is a man. Johnny Depp is a man. Brad Pitt in all his 40-year-old glory is a man. Men are good. Boys are good. People take them seriously to the best of their ability, but what happens when you come to those with the XY chromosomes who don’t quite fit the mould? I speak, naturally, of Beautiful Men.
I generally stick Beautiful Men in the “Other” category, because they are not quite men, but they’re not quite boys either. They are a category unto themselves. Whereas Men make your ovaries hurt, Beautiful Men give you cramps. You walk into walls. You forget how to speak. Beautiful Men tend to make women, and other men, act kind of stupid. You forgive the belching and scratching and other pet peeves. BM’s make us all a little messy, and they tend to bring down the average IQ in every room they enter. Jude Law is a beautiful man. Tom Welling may not be Einstein, but when he smiles, people do not fucking care. He is a beautiful man. And yet, in a society where everybody wants to be flawless and thin and *perfect* (whatever the hell that is), is it really better to be an “Other?”
I suspect it must be a bit harder to be taken seriously if you’re a Beautiful Man, because who really cares what you have to say? You look good; people don’t want to hear your thoughts on global warming! So, is it better to be beautiful, but not preternaturally so? Can life really be hard when you look like Jude Law? In an recent Details interview, he talked about 2003 being the worst year of his life. He split with his wife, their divorce was all over the rags, and then he had to explain it all to his children. This cannot have been easy by any account, but it makes you wonder -- people have to go through this same thing everyday, so it’s not like he’s the first person to have a messy divorce. And yet, do you think people have more sympathy for him because he’s good looking or less? Why? Do we always feel this way about people we consider to be more attractive than normal? Why? Is it jealousy? Conditioning? I understand the scientific explanations about feature placement and the way that humans tend to desire symmetry, etc, but I really do have to ask, do people think that life is better for the pretty people just because they can get in a club easier or a few free drinks?
Do you guys think being attractive all it’s cracked up to be? And who would you rather have? A Man, a Boy or an Other?
*Who knew Jude Law could make anybody think so hard!
[Poll #239134]
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 12:45 am (UTC)The thing is that some Boys are way too...Boyish. You know what I mean? What I want? What I *really* want? Is a Boy who's got a fine veneer of Man. *racks brain for examples* Uhm. Well. I'm thinking of people in my real life now, and that's way not helping. *laughs* But you get what I mean, right? He can be a Man when it's time, he can step up to the plate and make your ovaries hurt, but he can also go home and drink beer and eat pizza and play GTO with you.
Maybe later in life I'll want something different, but right now? That's where it's at for me.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 12:50 am (UTC)And no, I definitely don't think life is easier for the pretty people. I think it *can* be, sure. It definitely can have its perks. But everytime I start getting jealous, I remember a girl who used to be a friend of mine. She's gorgeous--stunningly, drop dead, heartbreakingly beautiful. I don't know if she ever modeled, but she could have, easily. To boot, she has a spectacular voice, and has been singing locally on open mic nights and with various local bands for a few years. She's also spectacularly screwed up, and while some of her problems have roots in your standard childhood issues, it's always been my (private) opinion that they've been complicated because of the attention she receives--from men and women--because of her looks. Guys--married guys, single guys, nice guys, and especially sleazy guys--*constantly* come on to her, whenever she goes out. Women--some of whom I *know* are in general sweet, not insecure people--often hate her on sight, because their boyfriends start to salivate when they see her.
So I think about her, and there's no way I can believe that life is inherently easier for someone who's that good looking. She just has a whole diferent set of problems, I think.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 06:31 pm (UTC)Speaking of Jude Law looking like something you want to pick up at a store and lick, have you seen the photo spread from this month's Flaunt? It's all about these zoom shots and the tinyness of pores. It's rather disconcerting. Of course it's not disconcerting to have his face everywhere, but more in that, bugger, is there really only one of him, way.
So I think about her, and there's no way I can believe that life is inherently easier for someone who's that good looking. She just has a whole diferent set of problems, I think.
The same principle is generally applied to the rich, and/or the famous, it's not that they don't have problems, they just have different ones. I quite understand the concept, but as you pointed out, or perhaps I did somewhere, when you first see someone so gorgeous, your first thought is not 'did they have a screwed up childhood?' Inevitably it's this person is too gorgeous/too this/ too that. I believe it's harder to relate to someone who find too beautiful because it's intimidating and intimidation is a form of attack. And people want to protect themselves from attack, so they don't consider the human aspect as much as they might with someone they don't find as intimidating, i.e. as beautiful.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 12:53 am (UTC)While people do split up all the time, in the last year, Law's wife Sadie was battling a depression so severe she was hospitalized, one of their children was hospitalized for eating an ecstacy pill off the floor of the restaurant where her birthday party was being held, the tabloids were circulating rumors overtime about who Jude was fucking that broke up his marriage, and then he got divorced. I think that this qualifies pretty well for a seriously bad year for almost anyone, and I think the pressure of the public scrutiny would make it all so much horribly worse, and just having people saying such mean things about you in public as the tabloids were about him, accusing him and Sadie of not being fit parents, etc. I mean, yes, everyone has tragedy in their lives, no question. But I don't think Jude's really being a whiner when he says it was a bad year.
And while there is no question that good looking people get a lot of breaks because of their looks, I think it would be hard to be as overwhelmingly beautiful as Jude is. You'd hardly ever run across *anyone* who didn't want something from you, even before you got famous. It would be really tempting to believe that your looks were the only thing that you're good for, and a lot of people would be very happy to tell you that this is precisely the case. I think I'd rather have the problems of the beautiful and rich than the problems of the ugly and poor, but I think the happiest are probably those who are just good looking enough to make things a little easier, just smart enough to take advantage of the situation, and wise enough to be happy no matter what happens. Moderation in all things, etc.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 06:38 pm (UTC)I think the happiest are probably those who are just good looking enough to make things a little easier, just smart enough to take advantage of the situation, and wise enough to be happy no matter what happens. Moderation in all things, etc.
I don't tend to think anybody is as happy as they suspect everyone else it. I think it's a matter of the grass always looking greener elsewhere. When you're not as asthetically appealing, you think that being moreso might make things better. When you're more appealing, it seems that you think it might be easier to be little less, because then you might be taken more seriously.
*Note: Purely using 'you' in the generic sense here.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 12:55 am (UTC)I don't quite trust Beautiful Men in real life, because most of the ones I've met are conceited jerks.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 06:39 pm (UTC)I agree 100%.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 01:00 am (UTC)It might be harder to feel some sense of connection to The BP. I mean, really, how many of us can get what it's like to be looked at that way? There's got to be a built in sense of resentment whether we acknowledge it or not. BP have learned early and often that being Beautiful is often enough and very very few of them ever make the effort to do anything else. Is this a fair statement? Eh, probably not. But based on my rather small experience, it's still true. Beautiful men and Beautiful women get more breaks than the average citizen. It ain't fair, but it's really hard to feel bad for them when life dumps badness on them the way it dumps on the rest of us.
Color me cynical, eh?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 06:41 pm (UTC)Word. One big plate of word, just for you. A man who cooks and looks good doing it. Oh, yes.
It might be harder to feel some sense of connection to The BP. I mean, really, how many of us can get what it's like to be looked at that way? There's got to be a built in sense of resentment whether we acknowledge it or not. BP have learned early and often that being Beautiful is often enough and very very few of them ever make the effort to do anything else. Is this a fair statement? Eh, probably not. But based on my rather small experience, it's still true. Beautiful men and Beautiful women get more breaks than the average citizen. It ain't fair, but it's really hard to feel bad for them when life dumps badness on them the way it dumps on the rest of us.
Color me cynical, eh?
I was just going to color you pink, but we can do cynical if you want. What color do you think that is? Forest green? Maize? Cornflower blue? And thank you so much for answering my question. *adores*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 01:10 am (UTC)Now as for which one I would rather have, well, that's messy. When my guy leaves the house M-F he's a man, suit, cell, SUV, the whole nine yards. But on the evenings and weekends he's a Chuck Taylor wearing, dude saying, beer drinking, pizza eating boy. And when he's with his boys? He's all of 13, 14 tops.
I think a hybrid is the way to go these days.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 06:42 pm (UTC)*dies*
Now as for which one I would rather have, well, that's messy. When my guy leaves the house M-F he's a man, suit, cell, SUV, the whole nine yards. But on the evenings and weekends he's a Chuck Taylor wearing, dude saying, beer drinking, pizza eating boy. And when he's with his boys? He's all of 13, 14 tops.
I think a hybrid is the way to go these days.
You are a lucky woman. Most of us can only hope for something quite so good.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 01:11 am (UTC)I've met all three - I'm friends with all three. I love all three types. I mean, boys are fun and you can burp and they treat you like a bud, but better. Men can occasionally be too serious - I mean, I want someone who strikes the perfect balance between funny and calm. A Ban? A Moy?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 01:11 am (UTC)Yes! It's called lookism and there have been many articles published about it. They've done studies on this. Beautiful people make more money, recieve better service from police and doctors etc. Two people can give the exact same speech and the better looking one will be rated as smarter and more competent by listeners. People have been hired to be on what they think are mock juries for law school practice. In actuality it's all scripted, the only difference is the appearance of the defendant. One is better looking than the other. The vast majority of the time, the better looking person will be found innocent, and the not so attractive person will be found guilty. A good looking (especially if they're white) missing child will recieve far more attention from the media than an unattractive child. On average, good looking people lead far easier lives.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 01:15 am (UTC)As for personally, I like a man who can be a boy. Most of my friends are boys and boys, sadly, tend not to grow up so much. They pick a lifestyle that works for them and, unless they chose to become a man, they are content with it. Men have the luxury of being boys when they want to be. Men, however, have far more power to hurt you than boys do. But they're usually worth it all far more in the long run.
Unless, of course, you're just looking for sex, in which case, you want a pretty boy. Mmmmmm.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 03:54 am (UTC)ooohh, you know what? While yes, having sex with a pretty boy might be good for you if you're taping to watch later, *wink*, in my experience, sex is SO MUCH BETTER with boys/men who are average looking. Why? Because pretty boys don't have to *work* at getting someone to go to bed with them. Girls will just fall into their beds simply because they are pretty. Thus, they either a) lack sufficient knowledge as to how to really *please* a woman and/or b) just simply know that it doesn't matter if they aren't any good...they *think* they are good because they get so many partners, and hell, what woman is going to complain after she's just had sex with a Beautiful Other? *laughs* An average looking guy? Has to work for it. He has to know what he's doing and do it *well*. He makes damned sure to please you, so you'll keep coming back for more.
whoa. didn't mean to ramble on there. Back to Zahra's regularly scheduled program. Also, damn, all this talk about sex has me horny...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 02:09 am (UTC)I can't even begin to fathom the Beautiful Others.
I think people - myself included - have less sympathy for the rich and beautiful, because they are rich and beautiful.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:19 pm (UTC)I agree with you completely.
I can't even begin to fathom the Beautiful Others.
What a delicious oxymoron. There are lots of people who would quip that there's nothing to fathom in the first place.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 02:11 am (UTC)Downsides like: being followed out of grocery stores, followed through the mall, followed to your car, then followed as you drive your car.
Like being stalked, to the point of needing to have your number changed and large burly friends risk criminal prosecution to intervene.
Like having your life so invaded that you take a shooting class and buy a pistol.
Like having the word "beautiful" twisted to become an automatic warning bell of impending sexual abuse...and thus being unable to accept any compliment at face value.
Like having your boss believe that you are fairgame to make innuendoes about, secretly, with "the guys," that reduce your professional identity to a "skirt."
Like going to a party and having people constantly clinging, invading your space, interrupting your conversation with the person you're trying to talk with.
Like partners who initially claim to love and respect your independent nature, but gradually become possessive assholes who view you as a nothing more than an attractive trophy.
I'm not model-gorgeous or famous. I would put myself on the nice side of average, and all of the above has happened to me. I'm sure heightism plays a large part in this, since I'm extremely short and there's a hind-brain connection between "tiny women" and "easy prey."
I'm not playing "poor-pretty-me" here, either. I am not inclined to perpetuate my victimology, since I've survived more than I would wish on anyone and I'm stronger for the experience. But here's the thing: *Everyone* likes to feel attractive, no matter what they look like. It's a great feeling to know that your appearance is appreciated ... even if it's a completly shallow observation. I love to people-watch, and I think it's fine as long as boundaries are respected. All the problems I've encountered have involved people disrespecting the healthy boundary lines between me and them.
It's worth considering who we do and don't endow with power--the pretty, the wealthy, the talented, the brilliant, etc--and what we expect of them in return. If we give Jude our fannish devotion, are we expecting him to let us into his home for dinner? I wouldn't dare to presume, but that's just me.
It's a tremendously complicated social dynamic, and honestly I don't have any answers. I just wanted to throw in $0.02 worth of a hopefully different angle on it.
I read a study a few months ago that said people tend to seek mates of equal attractiveness as themselves.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 02:16 am (UTC)I read a study a few months ago that said people tend to seek mates of equal attractiveness as themselves. That's whom I find myself really attracted to on a "looks-only" level. Male or female, doesn't matter. Just close enough to me that I feel like we're somehow cut from the same cloth.
Of course, I've dated across the spectrum from model-pretty to really significantly unattractive...since hey, nice people come in all kinds of packages. ;) None of them worked out, though. At least not yet.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:54 pm (UTC)You are not helping matters, Lyra, you keep talking about men and all their scruffy, hot *Men* glory and I keep thinking about George sodding Clooney, who is like, alllll man. And... and I can't think! Damn you!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 03:56 am (UTC)and i'm not just being a smartypants. i love looking at the pretty men, watching the boys have their fun etc. but i can't say i really want any of those things for myself. i want a woman for myself, when i'm thinking in those broad, categorical terms.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 04:45 am (UTC)But, honestly, I do prefer me a butch on a motorcycle.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 11:13 am (UTC)I read this and nearly choked to death on the apple I was eating. If looks could kill, huh?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 02:49 pm (UTC)On your point concerning Beautiful Men, I think that beautiful men are both privelaged by and victimized by their looks. While they do manage a degree of success they probably would not have reached without their phenomenal looks they also pay the price. Beautiful men are often looked down upon, people think that they got where they did due to their looks and not talent (Tom Welling). Plus, in a lot of cases, there's this whole "beautiful men are not real men" sentiment going on. They get labeled pretty instead of handsome or hot. And I think they get targeted for their looks - I swear a lot of people think poorly of Orlando Bloom just because he's so damn pretty. But then again, would he have gotten the role that made his career if he didn't look that good? Who knows?
(Ok, I realize I sound pedantic and stilted - but I hope I got my point across - if I ever even had a point to beging with. Damn snow frying my brains.)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 05:07 pm (UTC)It's kind of like White Zinfandel--light, sweet, crisp, refreshing, but not a whole lot of depth. Sometimes you just need a fine Chardonnay (I'd say Merlot but I hate red wine).
Of course, I like a good champagne. I like my man to sparkle!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:59 pm (UTC)You want a drag queen?
*winks*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 05:39 pm (UTC)I think the Beautiful Man syndrome you describe here is why actors, like Johnny Depp, Brad Pitt, etc- men who were pegged as *beautiful* men early on eventually start showing up to premieres with man of the mountain beards, and fried out, overbleached hair. The only way people will take them *seriously* is if they aren't beautiful anymore. That's just my theory, though.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 08:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 06:03 pm (UTC)Also? If you find yourself saying, "Honey, I need you to play the quiet game now" more than three times a week? It's time to break up.
I tend to go more for Boys now, but that's because I'm a confirmed commitment-phobe, and Men are generally seeking serious relationships.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 08:13 pm (UTC)*dies laughing*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 09:27 pm (UTC)Really, I have trouble with boxes - given 3 or 4 categories, I immediately start thinking of all the exceptions. Mostly my reaction is amusing me, as usually it's women who're getting limited to a small number of options.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 10:15 pm (UTC)Oh my god, no, that is so not what I was trying to say at all. I'm sorry if it comes off that way. I like suits, yes, but they're certainly not the be all and end all, and I certainly never meant to imply that only white-collar possessors of the XY chromosomes could be Men. It's like saying that only people who are married and straight can be dads; it's so absurd as to never even cross my mind. I only mentioned suits because I simply tend to like them, but clothes do not make the man, the man makes the man, fullstop. Whether he's in jeans and tee shirts or a rubbish sack. I'm terribly sorry to have given offense.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-27 10:16 pm (UTC)Whatever makes you happy.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-28 12:49 am (UTC)As for Beautiful Others.... Well, I'm told I was an uncommonly pretty child, and certainly adults seemed inclined to cuddle or touch me more than I, an extreme introvert, was inclined to let them. When I was a teen, I had braces and glasses, and there were many times when it was a relief to be left to my books because I no longer drew the eye. Of course, there were other times when my "sudden plainness" wasn't nearly so comforting, like when people would try to interact with me just to get closer to my two very pretty sisters. After I got the braces off and replaced the glasses with contacts, it was amusing to see people who'd known me before change their behavior in response to my changed appearance. Sickening, on some levels, but amusing.
I try not to judge the Beautiful Others based on their looks, since there are those who will and have classified me as a Beautiful Other. I'm usually more inclined to judge based on what I see of their behavior and hear of their thought processes. Still, there's really no way of getting around that I only care about their behavior and thought processes because of their presence in my life as Beautiful Others.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-29 01:30 am (UTC)This intrigues me. How do you, for yourself, define someone as a Beautiful Other? Are they more worthy of your time? Why? How do you delineate between them and Non-Beautiful Others? Do you hold them to different standards? If so, what?
Re:
From: