Bi-annual meta rave!
Jul. 14th, 2005 02:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Recommendation: A Place to Be by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
In the run up to the HBP business I've been trying to get my ducks in a row regarding this Montague business and whether or not I really want to kill Harry with my bare hands or if I just have not-so-latent Slytherin rage.
I'm not really sure these days if I hate Harry the character or I loathe what he's come to represent in canon and fanon. What does he represent to me, you ask?
Incessant whinging.
I've always been a great believer in the 'Shut the fuck up, and get on with it' school of thought, and Harry dwells and moans and bitches, like, well, a little bitch. I understand that this is the way of teenagers, to moan and whinge and skulk around the house because they are so misunderstood. I wasn't a teen that long ago; I know the drill.
What's missing from Harry now, for me, is that empathy. And the sympathy.
The thing is -- I used to like Harry, a lot, but the longer I spend in fandom they less I like him, and the more I find him a snivelling little shit. And really. I don't want that. I don't feel required to like him, but I want to be able to write him, or at least read about him, without thinking 'die!die!die' or 'Neville could do it so much better.'*
*I think that anyway, but that's not the point just now.
I think if JKR were more balanced in her characterisation, I'd be happier. If Harry seemed to be held accountable (besides to that fruitcake, Umbridge) for being a drama queen and irrational, and so in need of anger management classes, I'd be really happy.
I understand that Harry's having a tough time, but guess what? So is the fucking person next door! Chances are they just found out that their dad's a Death Eater, or that their mum's got an incurable disease or that all the money's gone.
Bad shit happens to people every day.
You are born; you live; one day, you grow old and die. It sucks, but that's the way of the fucking world.
The only difference is what you do with the time you've got. I am so tired of Harry acting like he's fucking entitled to anything more than the person next door just because he's got some fucking scar on his forehead.
I don't like the imbalance of feeling like I should love him just because he's got more, or less, than anybody else. Make me like him for himself and not because his name's all over the cover of the book.
While we're on imbalance and unbalanced though, can I just get this hate-crime business off my chest for a moment?
I know there's been talk of seeing the Montague-in-the-Vanishing-Cupboard as a hate-crime and while I think it was malicious, I don't know if was a hate crime. Montague provoked the twins. He's not blameless.
I don’t want to diminish the impact of what they did, because that shit was fucking serious; and I'm having issues here, because I've always liked the twins. I always thought they belonged in Slytherin too, but that's not the point. Someone explain to me what kind of message JKR is trying to send, because she never fucking addresses it!
I don't think that when you stick someone in a cupboard, and they reemerge in a toilet, you should ignore it. Call me old-fashioned.
So maybe, my real issue is JKR's lack of balance. I mean the twins lock a Slytherin in a cupboard, the poor boy shows up six days later in a fucking toilet and there's no fucking retribution?! There's no nothing? Regardless of what they intended, that was wrong.
If a Slytherin had done something like that, they would've been strung up by their gonads! But because they're Gryffindors it's excusable, and that, to me, is fucked up.
No sodding balance.
If you do something wrong, you should be called to the mat, regardless, but apparently, in the wizarding world, like the real world, if you have a little fame or are on 'the side of right' then you're not held accountable for your actions.
That's just fucked up -- but I guess that's the way of JKR's world too.
Okay, I had to get that off my chest, even if it didn't make any sense. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programme, which is trying to rub two words together and form a story.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 09:37 pm (UTC)Word.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 11:11 pm (UTC)Anyway, stepping off the soapbox now. . .
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 09:40 pm (UTC)However, I will never admit that the twinses should be punished...unless it was naughty.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 12:07 am (UTC)The problem with that is that the characterization that was so bad was the main character about whom 99.9% of the book is about. The other .1% is about Hagrid and Grawp, which is bad and wrong in and of itself.
And yes, the twins did do something wrong and they should have been taken to task for it, even though they probably didn't know how it would end up (though if they did, you know it was because one of them pushed the other one in and he wound up in the toilet as well). The books are very Gryffindor-centric and they're allowed much more (unless they're caught out by Snape), but that stems, again, from Harry's POV.
JKR needs to give Harry a bit more perspective and a bit of tempering. I find him to be annoying and whiny. The other reason I disliked OotP so much is that it that even when others are present (such as during the DA meetings) or even during the fight at the Ministry, the tertiary characters are barely important in the scope of things. It's All. Harry. All. The. Time, and it's a bit wearing as he's nothing but an annoying little prig throughout most of the book.
<-- has issues, obviously.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 12:14 am (UTC)In which case I could only be placated by lots of porn. *hints*
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 12:24 am (UTC)Deal?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 12:55 am (UTC)If nothing else, surely there's some Slytherin dying to get back at the twinses?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 09:41 pm (UTC)There's this great book called Thristy by M. T. Anderson which is all about mocking teen boy angst, if you have a chance, you should check it out. It's incredibly morbid, but it's fucking hilarious, too.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 09:49 pm (UTC)It's that combined with his insistence that he doesn't want to be treated any differently that aggravates me. Just come down on one side or the other. Draco is blatant about the fact he believes he deserves preferential treatment, and whilst that can come off as a little too egotistical for my tastes, it's a lot more bearable than the constant dilly-dallying.
Also, Ron and Hermione are his friends. And part of being a friend is being there to be yelled at occasionally. Someone needs to kick Harry whilst repeating that at him. And then maybe we might be spared a little.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 11:04 pm (UTC)It's that combined with his insistence that he doesn't want to be treated any differently that aggravates me.
Yes! Exactly. Of course, people are hypocritical all the time, but really, if you're sekritly enjoying being a celebrity, don't make a big stink about how you are so tried and no one understands you and how you are going to become a hermit and living in the Lake District. Or something to that effect :)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 04:09 pm (UTC)If you were really feeling all that put upon you'd withdraw and go all silent, and I would love that to happen. Less Harry? Always a good thing. How about a few more solid mentions of the other houses? Would that be so crazy?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 10:12 pm (UTC)It's only cos I like you, that you are allowed to live! anybody else would die!die!die!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 11:15 pm (UTC)Stay away from the Coachella community. There's a big scrolling thingie. I only saw the first word so I have no idea what it refers to, but I mentally shrieked and hit the end key so I wouldn't have to see it anymore.
Shit, I think I am just going to stay away from the Internet from now until Saturday, which is when I'll be done with the book. You'll zip through it too, right? I need to know who I can talk to when I'm done and who is going to take a long time reading it.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 11:41 pm (UTC)I REALLY like Slytherin, a lot. It makes me happy that you write about them, especially with the casting and everything. It's great.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 05:02 am (UTC)I think, really, (about to go defcon 5 meta) that what happened with the Slytherin identification thing is that at one point we wrote to explain how ambitious and cunning didn't mean evil and racists. Then that sort of transmuted into us against them, as all such things will do. That doesn't mean we lost the plot of ambition not equalling evil, because, come on, who doesn't have a dream and want to make it happen? Everyone does. The difference is the spark, the drive to make things happen. That's what being Slytherin is about, not all the Death Eater malarky.
And I still believe that the whole Gryffindor propaganda bit about all the worst wizards and witches being from Slytherin is just that, propaganda. Obviously Hufflepuffs are the ideal minions, and Ravenclaws think they're so smart that at least a few of them must have plans to take over the world. Gimme a break. Even a Gryffindor, if tricked by a lover or a family memeber could fall quite easily, out of loyalty, into evil.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 10:29 pm (UTC)but now it's just all so mired with scraps of badfic and people who do a damn fine job of characterization that it all gets messed up in my head, and being in utter love with most things slytherin, I find myself sitting the fence on the potter subject. But I do remember thinking he was an utter waste of flesh at the end of the last book, and that's apparently enough to make me sort of wonder how well I'm going to enjoy the next.
*sighs and goes back to nervous waiting*
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 10:28 pm (UTC)Dude, the caps. The fucking caps. Please, save me from the fracking caps.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-14 10:42 pm (UTC)The invention of the wizarding world was a perfect smoke screen for the paultry and cardboard treatment of ANYONE who isn't a Gryffindor. And, sigh, the Gryffindors don't come off much better. The one exception is when Ron got royally jealous during the Triwizard Tournament. THAT was normal.
Am with you 100%. Wonder if anyone reined her in. I think the last book was the WORST.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 01:58 am (UTC)*coughs* Hmm. Give him a lightsaber and place the scar a little differently... *grins* Except I totally empathize with Mr. Skywalker, so the points a bit moot.
The only difference is what you do with the time you've got. I am so tired of Harry acting like he's fucking entitled to anything more than the person next door just because he's got some fucking scar on his forehead.
I hate to be redundant (because I think someone already mentioned it in one of the comments above), but what gets me is that from day 1 in Philosopher's Stone, is that Harry is a little bashful and completely insistant on everyone treating him like he's nothing special, I mean, that's the entire justification for the manner in which he was raised, right?
Dumbledore thought putting him in the harshest, most cruel inviroment possible would help him become humble, which, while an interesting idea, rides a lot on the person subjected to such conditioning's personality. All that does is create this huge buffer space fortified by resentment and hatred to fill up with all the could've beens and everything Harry thinks he's deserved because he wasn't treated kindly or equally or even bloody normally. Serves them fucking right if they thought that would make Harry humble and responsible.
Draco's resentment of Harry because of his special treatment at Hogwarts allowed for Harry to become truly and fully aware of his "supposed" role and at the same time allowed his hate to become redirected at someone that he recognized loathed him because of "special" treatment, not because they didn't understand him or that he was unwanted. As a reverse effect, Harry likely ate up the fact that Malfoy's dislike of him (plus coddling from various other sources and of course, his own actual power) meant he was, in fact, significant, and helped make him just angrier.
Especially in the moments where someone tells him to sit down and shut the fuck up, or in moments where he doesn't get a position or an honor because he's not really a beacon of self-controll and responsability. I don't hate him by a long shot, because I know what it feels like to be that frustrated, but even I don't fucking whine that much, and there always comes a point where you seriously need to slap a bitch, and Harry's point has happened several times already.
So maybe, my real issue is JKR's lack of balance. I mean the twins lock a Slytherin in a cupboard, the poor boy shows up six days later in a fucking toilet and there's no fucking retribution?! There's no nothing? Regardless of what they intended, that was wrong.
And do the Gryffindors ever get punished for shit like that? NO. You have NO IDEA how angry that makes me. Because everyone in that bloody book always assumes its benign juvenille pranking when it's Gryffindor and if it's Slytherin, that it's malicious, and why someone can't seem to get it into their bloody heads that Gryffindors are capable of malice just like the next person is completely beyond me in such a way that makes me want to send a fucking rant to JKR specifically on the nature of justice and fairness and why the hell someone on the staff doesn't get in just as much of a hissy fit over the imbalance as we do. I mean God, not Dumbledore, please, but at times I wonder why McGonagle doesn't say something, because I at least had some respect for her. *growls*
If you do something wrong, you should be called to the mat, regardless, but apparently, in the wizarding world, like the real world, if you have a little fame or are on 'the side of right' then you're not held accountable for your actions.
*gets off soapbox*
Oh, sweetheart, it doesn't always work like that in the real world either. *sighs* But I understand the rage, I do.
I must sadly go and vomit into a toilet now, as I'm sick, but I'm so happy someone else got as pissed off as I did about the twins' prank. And spot on with the Harry needs anger management assesment too.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 04:14 am (UTC)If you do something wrong, you should be called to the mat, regardless, but apparently, in the wizarding world, like the real world, if you have a little fame or are on 'the side of right' then you're not held accountable for your actions.
Wouldn't that be her point? I think especially in the past 2 books have she's liked to show how screwed up and stupid the wizarding world is, just like the real world. Media disinformation, government conceiling information to the point of emptying courses of all relevance, etc.; The very idea of competing houses, which I've felt uneasy about since day one, was questioned, I seem to recall, by a character or another in OoTP.
There were also the character flaws: seriously bad judgment calls, imo, on DUMBLEDORE's part in raising Harry, also on keeping him in the dark for that long; We find out that James, in his day, could be a bit cruel and arrogant sometimes, Sirius was immature and irresponsible in OoTP, Snape keeps taking an old grudge out on a kid...
I'm not trying to say JKR is some goddess or that her writing is flawless--far from it. However, I think that what OoTP did was to bring out all the flaws, especially in the "good guys" and, while it hurts, I enjoyed that.
I think her lack of balance is in the way she describes the Dursley's treatment of Harry. If they treated him that way when he was only a baby, I don't know how he even survived, let alone become a functioning (if whiny) person.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 05:09 am (UTC)She's shit at characterization and took the most appealing fictional character in the past twenty years and made him insufferable and boorish.
There is NO balance. I understood in OotP that the idea is that all kids feel they're put upon and maltreated. Yes. Ok, fine. That's true. So, Harry feels that way, but he REALLY IS maltreated, so there is the feeling of vindication for all kids who read the book. We all hated our teachers. Harry's teachers really are out to get him. It's the gratification through fiction of all kids' fantasies. Alright, we get it.
However, that doesn't mean that Harry needs to be so completely intolerable in ever facet of his life. Or so stupid. Why doesn't he just tell his friends about Umbridge? That would be the natural move. JK's writing is so poor because she doesn't follow through with normal reactions to events. It makes me want to strangle a bitch!
Ok, I'm going to leave off now, because this is going to segue into my issues with all fiction writers and there inability to stick to reality.
In conclusion: the twins were wrong; Dumbledore favors Gryffindor in a way that is reprehensible; Slytherins should revolt and get better digs; Snape is the hero of the books.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 02:14 am (UTC)JK's writing is so poor because she doesn't follow through with normal reactions to events.
That's true.
It's like I've noticed in bad pre-teen or kid sitcoms that have episodes revolve around a single plot point, very often that plot point is a misunderstanding--but then it's a misunderstanding that can't possibly happen because even a completely stupid person would not have acted that way/disregarded that information/failed to cross-check/jumped to that conclusion.
It's weird because some of her character developments I like. It seems she favors her plot, however, so if a natural character reaction gets in the way of her preferred plot then we'll just have to get the conceited character action.
She's good at many things, but she's unable to juggle all seamlessly.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-15 07:06 pm (UTC)