[inquiring mind]
Mar. 20th, 2009 02:18 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I somehow found myself reading a critique of one of my stories (no, the point is not what the critique said), that said [Story X] was "a classic
hackthis story."
I have no idea what that means.
The stories I write are the ones I want to see. The ones that I want to write. I've always been firmly of the belief that if you want to see something written you should write it your damn self. But now, I am curious.
What does "a classic
hackthis story" mean to you? Comma abuse? Crack? Lots of cursing? Ari? Discuss.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I have no idea what that means.
The stories I write are the ones I want to see. The ones that I want to write. I've always been firmly of the belief that if you want to see something written you should write it your damn self. But now, I am curious.
What does "a classic
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 03:38 am (UTC)And also a sort of... I don't know, sparse? style. (We'll go with "sparse" since it's the best but not-quite-perfect word I can come up with...) You say so much with so little, conveying everything I said above in about half the word count of other writers. For a lot of writers, it would take several pages what you manage to do in two paragraphs.
You handle language beautifully. That's practically signature